Dan v. Dan 315 Conn. 1 (2014)

Landmark Supreme Court decision holding that the modification of an alimony award typically is not justified where the only substantial change in circumstances after the divorce is an increase in the alimony payor’s income and where the alimony award continues to meet the original purpose for which it was made. Broder Orland Murray & DeMattie LLC represented the alimony payor, who was ultimately successful on appeal, in the post-judgment modification trial.